image formats

PNG vs WebP: which image format should you ship?

WebP is the format that quietly changed web performance. Google introduced it in 2010 as a format that could do everything the old formats did, but smaller. Compared to PNG, a lossless WebP is typically 25–35% smaller — sometimes more — with identical pixels. Compared to JPG, lossy WebP is usually 25–35% smaller at the same visual quality. That is why every modern browser, and most image tools, now treat WebP as the default export. You can convert PNG to WebP (or WebP back to PNG) in your browser in seconds.

PNG vs WebP — which to ship? — format comparison illustration
PNG vs WebP — which to ship?· explained in plain English

What WebP is

WebP is two codecs under one container. The lossy variant uses VP8/VP9-style block prediction to remove redundancy the way JPG does, but more efficiently. The lossless variant uses a combination of prediction, palette and entropy coding to shrink data without dropping a single pixel. A single format, one file extension, two very different compression engines underneath.

Support is not a concern anymore. WebP decodes in Chrome, Edge, Firefox, Safari 14+, Android, and is handled natively by WordPress and most CMS and image libraries. If you are targeting the web, WebP is safe.

PNG vs WebP — which to ship? — how the formats compare in practice
Fig. 1 · PNG vs WebP — which to ship? at a glance

WebP vs PNG, point by point

PNG and WebP compared
PNGWebP
Lossless modeYesYes, ~25–35% smaller
TransparencyYesYes
Lossy modeNoYes — with transparency, too
AnimationNoYes (animated WebP)
Browser supportUniversalUniversal (Safari 14+)

When PNG is still the right call

PNG is a 30-year-old standard with a guarantee WebP does not quite match: universal, deterministic compatibility with every tool ever written. If your image will end up in a print pipeline, a proprietary CMS, an email client older than 2019, or a system you do not control, PNG is the safe envelope.

It also keeps one workflow advantage: PNG is the de-facto interchange format for design tools, and an easy lossless master to keep and re-export from. Many teams keep the PNG master and ship WebP to the web — the best of both.

The practical move

For web images, the default export should be WebP, with PNG reserved for master files and unknown destinations. Converting is lossless in the pixel sense — a PNG→WebP→PNG round trip returns the same pixels — so switching is not a commitment.

Frequently asked questions

Is WebP better than PNG?

For most web use, yes: same pixels, 25–35% smaller files. PNG remains the right choice for master files, print pipelines and software that predates WebP support.

Does converting PNG to WebP lose quality?

Not in lossless mode. A lossless WebP stores the exact same pixels as the source PNG — the file is smaller, the image is identical.

Does WebP support transparency?

Yes. Lossless WebP supports full alpha transparency exactly like PNG, and even lossy WebP can carry a transparency channel.

Can I convert WebP back to PNG?

Yes — and because WebP lossless is lossless, converting back returns the original pixels. Use the [WebP to PNG converter](/convert/webp-to-png).

Convert it

Each conversion runs in your browser — free, unlimited, and nothing is uploaded.

Share this guide

Ready-made social images for this post — sized for Facebook/Open Graph, Instagram and Pinterest. They match the card link previews show, and the same art is rendered locally for every format below.

PNG vs WebP — which to ship? — Facebook · Open Graph share card (1200 × 630 px)

Facebook · Open Graph

og:image — also LinkedIn, X and Slack previews

Download PNG
PNG vs WebP — which to ship? — Instagram feed share card (1080 × 1080 px)

Instagram feed

square post · 1080px is Instagram’s native size

Download PNG
PNG vs WebP — which to ship? — Pinterest pin share card (1000 × 1500 px)

Pinterest pin

2:3 ratio · Pinterest’s recommended pin size

Download PNG

Sources

  1. WebP — Google Developers
  2. WebP — Wikipedia
  3. WebP image format — MDN